What happened to George Floyd was wrong and everyone knows it.  Everyone agrees it’s unacceptable and should never happen again.  Everyone agrees the officer with eighteen complaints should have been stopped long before this incident.  But he wasn’t.  And here’s where we are.

People are emotional, and that’s a human reaction we all feel.  A man was murdered.  Other officers saw what was happening but failed to stop it.  Bystanders saw what was happening and spoke out but were threatened with Mace.  And a man who should be alive is dead and now buried.

Skip forward past the united outrage to protests, then riots, then looting and destruction.  Then to defunding the police.

Put your emotions in a box and think.  Critically, think.  When you saw the video, you were appalled.  You were outraged and disgusted.

Now step back.  Clear your mind.  And put yourself in a police uniform from anywhere else in the country.  From that same department.  Watch the video again—from inside the uniform.  What is your reaction now?

You’re appalled.  You’re outraged and disgusted.  AND you are betrayed.  Betrayed that a brother in blue would do this.  He took the same oath to serve and protect that you took.  He joined the force to do just that, to make your city or town or state or nation a safer place for families to raise their kids and walk the streets without fear of harm.  He or she gets up every morning and hits those streets, taking on the risks of not coming home to his own family because s/he believes in something bigger, something that must be preserved for people to live free:  law and order.

Watching that video from inside that uniform, and you are ashamed of the offending officer.  You know that far too many are far too emotional to remember that the actions of one are not the actions of all.  You are just as upset—even more so—than others, because you know that you will be painted with his brush, though you have done nothing wrong. 

Still standing in that uniform, you watch your mayor and governor and state legislators abandon you and your fellow officers.  They throw you under the proverbial bus, subject you to verbal and physical abuse, because they aren’t worried about you or your career or how hard you’ve worked or how many risks you’ve taken or even how many lives you’ve saved.  They are worried about their re-election.  Winning it.  That’s what most matters to them.  Long ago, while citizens slept, trusting leaders to lead as citizens would lead, the meaning of public service and public servants fell to an insatiable hunger for power and control.  There are, of course, exceptions, and you know that.  But you look around and see far too few of these leaders stand up for the people or for you.

Given no choice, you must accept that you’ve been betrayed and abandoned, and you’ve done nothing wrong.  You stand falsely accused, condemned and convicted not because of any action you took but due to your uniform and your sincere belief in law and order.  Your desire, often a lifelong desire, to serve and protect.

Someone else commits the act.  You live with the fallout.

There is good and bad in everyone, including officers.  But right now, emotion is ruling the day.  Thinking is muddied by rage, and that rage is being misplaced.   In this, you cannot blame an entire group of professional law enforcement officers for the actions of one.  Regardless of what industry or profession you work in, there are those who excel at it, and those who do not.  Those born to do what they do, and those who belong elsewhere but have not yet realized it.

An anchor on TV asked if the police were defunded, and someone broke into her house in the middle of the night, who did she call.  The answer was realizing her privilege.  How do you think that anchor is going to fare against an armed intruder?

Another responded to that same kind of question with a recommendation to sit down and talk with the perpetrator and work it out.  How do you think that home invasion is going to resolve?   Think the homeowner who has been invaded fares well?

Let’s get practical.

In Minneapolis, the day the defund talk started, they began a push for “communities policing their own.”  Citizens would get rid of the police and deal with the crime in their communities.  Untrained citizens who are not professional law enforcement officers. 

How well would citizens do the job, and how would citizens fare?  How would the city and businesses that employ them fare?   

Let’s take an unemotional look at a few situations and see what we think:

  • In NYC, the day the defund talk started, a bomb was found.  If there are no police, what citizens are going to defuse that bomb?  Dispose of it in a manner that doesn’t get them or other citizens killed, maimed or injured?

  • What if your child goes missing? What citizens have the expertise or experience to investigate and provide the best possible odds of finding your child alive and bringing them safely home?   If abducted, who looks for them—your child and the abductor?

  • You’re rushing your infant to the hospital. Your child isn’t breathing.  You see a cruiser and flag down the officer, who administers CPR and, rather than waiting for an ambulance, he rushes your child to the hospital.  Your child’s life is saved.  What citizens know what to do in this situation—and are there to do it?  In this true story, plenty were around but none acted.  The officer, on his way home from work, did.

  • Your dream has finally been realized. You have your own neighborhood grocery store.  Weeks earlier, you were being praised by all for your bravery in staying open, making sure that people had food.  Now your store has been looted and burned to the ground.  Citizens didn’t stand the line to protect the store.  The mayor didn’t protect it.  And now you learn your insurance coverage doesn’t pay in cases of civil unrest.  You’ve lost everything you’ve worked for your whole life.  How did this happen when weeks ago, people appreciated so much what you were doing for them?  Taking everything from you is how you’re repaid.  Police are trained in riot control.  To prevent looting—and they do it, if they’re not ordered to stand down, by their mayor. 

You see the point.  Imagine all the different types of challenges—school protection, assaults on the street, complex RICO cases, hostage situations and everything in between.  Citizens are simply not equipped, trained or in many cases willing and able to meet those challenges.  Why would people take those who are trained and willing out of the picture and insert those who are not?

During the recent riots, 25,000 businesses were destroyed that won’t be coming back.  For those, their dreams are dead.  They must live with having done nothing wrong, but as a result of the actions of others, are now not in a position to rebuild and start over.

Now think about the impact on that community these businesses serviced.  Drug stores—gone.  Car parts (best not breakdown!)—gone.  Grocery stores—gone.  Who lives without them? 

Some say the federal government should have stepped in faster and with a firmer footprint.  Yet they ignore the fact that we live in a republic.  The mayors and governors and state legislators run the states.  It is on them to protect and defend the citizens in their states, and if they need help, to ask for it from the federal government. 

Those watching saw the federal government offer help and mayors and governors refuse it.  We read the letters from mayors refusing to call up the national guard in sufficient numbers to protect citizens of the states they took oaths to defend and protect.  We saw the federal government, like the police, be vilified and demonized for warning those state officials that if they didn’t take appropriate steps to defend their own citizens, the federal government would.  It has been done before.  Multiple times.  That promise to step in is what finally stopped a lot of the destruction.  

To those casting blame at the president and federal authorities, it would be wise to study how your government works.  These challenges are the result of mayors and governors not executing their duties appropriately.  That’s a simple truth. 

And it’s also what makes defunding the police an emotional and, I’m sorry to say, irrational response.  Up to eighty percent of the rioters were from out of state.  They infiltrated peaceful protests with ill intentions, fake identification, and stolen license plates on their vehicles.  They were flown in, driven in on buses, and many were paid to riot and loot. 

There were pre-staged pallets of bricks, ready for grabbing to destroy property that wasn’t theirs.  There were sticks, metal pipes, concrete milkshakes (to cause head injuries to those struck, many of whom were Secret Service agents guarding the White House), tennis balls filled with concrete, weapons and Molotov cocktails and other incendiary devices and bombs.

Defund the police?  A hard push to disarm the public and now to defund the police?  How then are all citizens not placed in greater jeopardy?  Think…

Those with the training and the desire to protect citizens are defunded and no longer on the job.  Are you aware 300 NYPD officers retired last week?  That 600 spoke to their superiors about resigning or retiring and might yet do it?  That hundreds were injured in the riots, and many were hospitalized for those injuries?  They faced everything from being run down by cars to being shot in the back of the head to being stabbed in the neck.  And that doesn’t take into account the verbal abuse.

Who is going to step into their shoes?  Who is going to willingly face what they face knowing the mayors, governors, and many state legislators will abandon them?  That many of the individuals arrested will be put right back on the street to rejoin the riots?

As stated in the beginning, there is one letter’s difference between DEFUND and DEFEND.  One letter, and that letter is U.

Think about it.  We all hate and resent what happened to George Floyd.  We all hate injustice and unfairness across the board.  We all want to live safe and free, to live our lives without having others kill us or our dreams as the result of something we oppose.

One last point.  Police are under intense scrutiny all the time.  Their actions are judged by many.  Internal Affairs.  Superior officers.  The mayor, the governor, watchdog groups, the people on the street.  More oversight isn’t the problem.  They’ve got tons of oversight. 

Before you paint them all with the brush of one whose actions the rest of the officers deplore, remember this:

Who ran into the buildings while citizens ran away on 9/11.

Who manned the streets during Covid pandemic to keep streets and citizens and businesses protected.

Who answered when you called 911 because someone you love was in crisis, had a medical emergency.

Who talked you through an emergency procedure that saved the life of someone needing help when you didn’t know what to do.

One. Letter. Different.  One.





About Vicki Hinze

USA Today Bestselling and Award-Winning Author of 50+ books, short stories/novellas and hundreds of articles. Published in as many as 63 countries and recognized by Who's Who in the World as an author and an educator. Former featured Columnist for Social-IN Worldwide Network and Book Fun Magazine. Sponsor/Founder of Vicki's latest novels are: in the Philanthropists series: The Guardian. In the StormWatch series, Deep Freeze. FMI visit
This entry was posted in Uncategorized, Vicki Hinze and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.


  1. successbmine says:

    Thank you, Vicki, for this amazing post. I am going to share it on my FaceBook profile and encourage my friends to share it as well. I believe everyone in the U.S. and Canada should read it. And anywhere else there is or might be a similar situation.

    “There is good and bad in everyone, including officers. But right now, emotion is ruling the day. Thinking is muddied by rage, and that rage is being misplaced.” This is so true. Rage is not nor has it ever been the answer to anything. It can only stir up more rage. As it says in Proverbs 15:1, A soft answer turns away wrath but a harsh word stirs up anger.” Rage simply stokes the fire hotter and leads to great destruction.

    I love the way you have repeated the word “think”, because I believe this is exactly what people do not do in these situations. They let the ringleaders do the thinking for them, and that is exactly the wrong kind of thinking to follow. I wonder how many ordinary citizens would be willing to go after a criminal when their own lives would be at stake and there would be no pay at the end of it, and no compensation to their family should they be killed while ‘on duty’. Who is going to be in charge of organizing them? Who is going to pay a police artist to make composite sketches of killers and abductors?

    This cry against all police officers as being tarred with the same brush is absolutely ludicrous. It kind of reminds you of what happened to Jesus. The crowds all praised Him and hung on to His every word, but then the pharisees started to churn up the people’s emotions until they were clambering to have Him crucified. A near riot situation. As you so aptly pointed out, it was the police among others who willingly entered the fallen buildings on 9/11, many to their death. People praised them then. And now, they have turned on them.

    Just that one little letter. U. You, me, every individual needs to take responsibility to make responsible choices. And defunding the police is not a responsible choice. God bless you for sharing in such an articulate and graphic manner. Let’s pray that more people will stop and take time to think before making irrational decisions and choices and alliances and statements to defund our defenders.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. successbmine says:

    You are most welcome. I didn’t realize until after I posted my comment just how long it was. 😮

    Liked by 1 person

  3. jrcoggins says:

    Plato said that democracy is replaced by tyranny when society descends into chaos. The idea is that people would rather fear one man than all men. Hopefully, we do not need to choose. If we do not want to defund the police and descend into chaos, then we need to make every effort to reform the police and weed out racists. If we have better police officers, people will have a better opinion of police. By the same token, if we don’t want tyranny and soldiers patrolling the streets, then we need to make sure that our demonstrations for justice do not descend into riots. I do not think blacks would be better off without police. That would just give free rein to white vigilantes with guns. There has been far too much of that already. Blanket accusations against all police officers will likely discourage good people from joining the force and fill up the ranks with racists and people who lack the skill and wisdom to find any other job. We need better police officers, not less qualified ones.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.